Hi Simon,

Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> (2024-05-07):
> Looking at the d-i Packages.gz for amd64, the only other source
> package that has picked up the bad libpng16-16t64-udeb dependency
> seems to be matchbox-keyboard, which needs a sourceful upload to fix an
> implicit-declarations FTBFS anyway, therefore isn't useful to binNMU.

Yeah, I forgot to mention it when I worked on making d-i buildable and
runnable again, then decided it didn't matter as it's not used (TTBOMK)
at the moment.

> After that: do the release/installer teams consider udeb dependencies
> on non-udeb packages, by udebs that d-i does not currently need or use,
> to be a RC issue or merely a nice-to-have?

If udebs are actually used, I call that an RC bug and try to get it
fixed swiftly (sometimes NMUing right away when time is of the essence).
Otherwise I usually let those fly (without even filing bug reports).

See: https://d-i.debian.org/dose/
Some backstory: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/03/msg00102.html


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to