Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 19:23 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > > > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > > In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so in theory, > > > I could fix this myself via team upload. Would you prefer > > > that I take care of this myself that way? > > > > I wouldn't mind if you did. There are some other bugs > > which could easily be fixed with a new upload (i.e. with > > minor patches in the bug tracker) > > > > > > (I would also handle bart-cuda, also affected but not reported yet) > > > > bart-cuda needs to be updated to 0.9.00 which should > > be straightforward in principle but need more work > > and a binary upload. > > Well, just in case: I'm talking about making an upload > for bullseye, using the same fix in bookworm, then > sending a bug to release.debian.org explaining the > issue, etc. > > That's mainly bureaucratic and will not interfere with your normal > work in unstable regarding new upstream releases and such (which > I still prefer not to handle myself). > Yes, if you do not mind to do the work, please update bullseye. That would be much appreciated. Martin
Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)
El 7/5/24 a las 18:50, Uecker, Martin escribió: Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so in theory, I could fix this myself via team upload. Would you prefer that I take care of this myself that way? I wouldn't mind if you did. There are some other bugs which could easily be fixed with a new upload (i.e. with minor patches in the bug tracker) (I would also handle bart-cuda, also affected but not reported yet) bart-cuda needs to be updated to 0.9.00 which should be straightforward in principle but need more work and a binary upload. Well, just in case: I'm talking about making an upload for bullseye, using the same fix in bookworm, then sending a bug to release.debian.org explaining the issue, etc. That's mainly bureaucratic and will not interfere with your normal work in unstable regarding new upstream releases and such (which I still prefer not to handle myself). Thanks.
Bug#1026061: [+externe Mail+] Re: Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)
Am Dienstag, dem 07.05.2024 um 17:59 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > El 1/1/23 a las 16:55, Uecker, Martin escribió: > > I can apply the patch, but I do not have much time now. > > Is there some urgency? > > Hello. A lot of time passed without activity on this bug. > > In the meantime, I became member of debian-med, so in theory, > I could fix this myself via team upload. Would you prefer > that I take care of this myself that way? I wouldn't mind if you did. There are some other bugs which could easily be fixed with a new upload (i.e. with minor patches in the bug tracker) > > (I would also handle bart-cuda, also affected but not reported yet) bart-cuda needs to be updated to 0.9.00 which should be straightforward in principle but need more work and a binary upload. Otherwise, I would have more time in July to do some work. Martin > > (Yes, I still think it would be worthy to fix this in bullseye, > for posterity and before it becomes LTS). > > Thanks.
