Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
stschikin closed pull request #793: Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2104502150 Thanks for the clarification @stschikin Please close your PR, TIA -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-10 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2104298510 After re-evaluating the entire pull request, it looks like I have confused TypeAttr entities with Attribute entities. Attribute entities need a AttrValue, but TypeAttr do not.

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095961995 Yes, we finally can keep it. A party has only one type, but a party type may have several attributes, hence several relations with a party. -- This is an automated message

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095786293 The relation to Party seems kind of redundant with the relation to PartyType. I thought I had seen similar relations in other entities of that type, but after rechecking the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095516741 Ha, I think I know why now, because of ``` ``` Right? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095508641 Hi @stschikin, Why did you remove? ``` ``` I see no pb with that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-06 Thread via GitHub
stschikin commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2095332774 Hi @JacquesLeRoux thanks for your advice. I have edited the original post as requested. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
JacquesLeRoux commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2093093862 Hi @stschikin , Please provide a description following our description template. 2 reasons here: 1. What's the problem or rather her reason of improvement 2.

Re: [PR] Fixed: PartyTypeAttr correction (OFBIZ-13076) [ofbiz-framework]

2024-05-03 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/793#issuecomment-2092728221 ## [![Quality Gate Passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/qg-passed-20px.png 'Quality Gate