[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-28 Thread Benjamin Drung
Submitted to Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs- tools/-/merge_requests/114 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 Title: performance regression in dracut-install

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-27 Thread Dave Jones
Results on a Pi 4B booting from SD card. Stock noble: $ sudo hyperfine -r 5 "update-initramfs -u" Benchmark 1: update-initramfs -u Time (mean ± σ): 189.984 s ± 1.618 s[User: 75.720

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
Stock noble on a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W: ``` bdrung@zero3:~$ sudo hyperfine -r 5 "update-initramfs -u" Benchmark 1: update-initramfs -u Time (mean ± σ): 415.664 s ± 6.015 s[User: 166.728 s, System: 232.523 s] Range (min … max): 409.139 s … 422.632 s5 runs ``` Replace duplicate

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lvm2 - 2.03.16-3ubuntu4 --- lvm2 (2.03.16-3ubuntu4) oracular; urgency=medium * initramfs-tools hook: Combine calls to manual_add_modules (LP: #2065180) -- Benjamin Drung Fri, 24 May 2024 09:42:08 +0200 ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package thin-provisioning-tools - 0.9.0-2ubuntu6 --- thin-provisioning-tools (0.9.0-2ubuntu6) oracular; urgency=medium * initramfs-hook: Combine calls to manual_add_modules (LP: #2065180) -- Benjamin Drung Fri, 24 May 2024 09:08:36 +0200 ** Changed

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
I marked thin-provisioning-tools, lvm2, and cryptsetup as affected to reduce the number of manual_add_modules calls in the initramfs-tools hooks in those packages. This will help a bit, but will probably not be enough to make it fast again. ** Also affects: thin-provisioning-tools (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dracut Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 Title: performance regression in dracut-install 060 To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Bug watch added: github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues #316 https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/316 ** Also affects: dracut via https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/316 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install 060

2024-05-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Summary changed: - performance regression in dracut-install + performance regression in dracut-install 060 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 Title: performance regression in

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-11 Thread Dave Jones
@viraniac well, you're absolutely right! Same SD card with a fresh noble install, running on a Pi 4, first stock and second with a downgraded dracut from mantic: Pi 4B, stock -- 03:05 Pi 4B, downgrade -- 01:10 That is a pretty substantial regression, and diff'ing the initrds once more showed

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-09 Thread Viraniac
Dave Jones, Could you please install dracut-install package from mantic on noble and rerun your tests? Link to dracut-install package from mantic - http://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/d/dracut/dracut- install_059-4ubuntu2_arm64.deb I have noticed that installing the above package significantly

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-09 Thread Dave Jones
Some results from some local testing. These tests were all performed on the same SD card (a Samsung EVO Select 64GB) with fresh installs of the jammy and noble server images, after running full upgrades and rebooting: Pi 5, noble -- 01:23 Pi 4B, noble -- 03:05 Pi 3B+, noble -- 05:19 Pi 5,

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-09 Thread Dave Jones
** Patch added: "initramfs.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dracut/+bug/2065180/+attachment/5776701/+files/initramfs.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-09 Thread numbqq
same issues on my arm devices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 Title: performance regression in dracut-install To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-08 Thread Viraniac
I have tested ubuntu server images on Khadas VIM4 and Raspberry Pi 4B 2GB variant. VIM4 Jammy - 22s Mantic - 21s Noble - 1m 30s RPi 4B Mantic - 1m 50s Noble - 3m 55s I don't have a amd64 system to test ubuntu on at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2065180] Re: performance regression in dracut-install

2024-05-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
dracut-install is used in initramfs-tools to speed up the build time. I tested `time update-initramfs -u` in chroots on my amd64 laptop. Results there: * jammy: 15.585s * mantic: 5.925s * noble: 6.466s So noble is a bit slower than mantic on my hardware. Is this slowdown hardware related or are