Turns out that backporting
https://github.com/moby/moby/commit/97921915a801dd82b1f5a70e0a69353539c1e3ae.patch
seems to actually make the test pass

I'm not sure why that worked before, but I've pushed a backport of that
patch to
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/docker/-/commit/d33659365984dbb47b6aac2836727e507c1ce737
to let the salsa pipeline work on it.

I plan to make a team-upload tomorrow or later in the week. Please let me
know if you have concerns or thoughts on this.

Thanks
-rt

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 11:20 AM Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been looking at this test failure, but remain puzzled.
>
> Basically, the source for this test is here:
> https://sources.debian.org/src/docker.io/20.10.25%2Bdfsg1-2/engine/distribution/xfer/download_test.go/#L364-L429.
> This test is testing code in
> https://sources.debian.org/src/docker.io/20.10.25+dfsg1-2/engine/distribution/xfer/download.go
> which has only two external dependencies
> (golang-github-docker-distribution-dev) and
> (golang-github-sirupsen-logrus-dev).
>
> I've checked the build log of the previous build at
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=docker.io&arch=amd64&ver=20.10.25%2Bdfsg1-2%2Bb3&stamp=1704672923&raw=0
> and note that the same test passes in that build. This also uses the same
> package versions of golang-github-docker-distribution-dev==2.8.2+ds1-1 and
> golang-github-sirupsen-logrus-dev==1.9.0-1
>
> I also note that the old build was using golang 1.21, and the FTBFS was
> introduced after upgrading unstable to golang 1.22.
>
> Shengjing, I believe you handled the recent update of the golang toolchain
> from 1.21 to 1.22. Have you seen similar "mysterious" test failures that
> resulted from using a newer golang compiler?
>
> I am considering just disabling this test, as the rest of the testsuite
> seem to pass, but I'm getting nervous that this wouldn't just paper over a
> real issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> regards,
>     Reinhard
>


-- 
regards,
    Reinhard

Reply via email to