On 06/05/2024 05.02, Bibo Mao wrote:
On LoongArch system, there is only virt machine type now, name
LOONGARCH_MACHINE is confused, rename it with VIRT_MACHINE. Machine name
about Other real hw boards can be added in future.
Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maob...@loongson.cn>
---
...
@@ -1245,7 +1244,7 @@ static void loongarch_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void
*data)
static const TypeInfo loongarch_machine_types[] = {
{
- .name = TYPE_LOONGARCH_MACHINE,
+ .name = TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE,
.parent = TYPE_MACHINE,
.instance_size = sizeof(LoongArchMachineState),
.class_init = loongarch_class_init,
diff --git a/include/hw/loongarch/virt.h b/include/hw/loongarch/virt.h
index 4e14bf6060..5ea2f0370d 100644
--- a/include/hw/loongarch/virt.h
+++ b/include/hw/loongarch/virt.h
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ struct LoongArchMachineState {
struct loongarch_boot_info bootinfo;
};
-#define TYPE_LOONGARCH_MACHINE MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("virt")
-OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(LoongArchMachineState, LOONGARCH_MACHINE)
+#define TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("virt")
+OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(LoongArchMachineState, VIRT_MACHINE)
bool loongarch_is_acpi_enabled(LoongArchMachineState *lams);
void loongarch_acpi_setup(LoongArchMachineState *lams);
#endif
Hi,
there are currently some efforts going on to create the possibility to link
a QEMU binary that contains all targets in one binary. Since we already have
a TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE for other targets, I wonder whether it might be better
to use LOONGARCH_VIRT_MACHINE than just VIRT_MACHINE here? Philippe, could
you comment on this?
Thomas
