zhengruifeng commented on code in PR #46397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/46397#discussion_r1590766241


##########
python/pyspark/sql/connect/group.py:
##########
@@ -398,11 +398,18 @@ def applyInPandas(
     ) -> "DataFrame":
         from pyspark.sql.connect.udf import UserDefinedFunction
         from pyspark.sql.connect.dataframe import DataFrame
+        from pyspark.sql.pandas.functions import _validate_pandas_udf  # type: 
ignore[attr-defined]
+
+        evalType = _validate_pandas_udf(
+            func,
+            schema,
+            PythonEvalType.SQL_COGROUPED_MAP_PANDAS_UDF,
+        )
 
         udf_obj = UserDefinedFunction(

Review Comment:
   PySpark Classic directly uses the `pandas_udf` method which include this 
check
   
   
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/c74f584481d9bcefda7e8ac2a37feb2d61891fe4/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/group_ops.py#L617-L620
   
   while in Spark Connect, it cannot use the output of `pandas_udf` method here 
and requires a `UserDefinedFunction` object.
   
   So I factor the check to a separate method and invoke it here.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to