Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2024-05-20 18:23:10 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > libpoppler134 has migrated to Testing and I don't see libpoppler126 > > there any more so I'm closing the poppler transition bug. > > FWIW,

Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 05:46:31PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > dak reports no rdeps on mirror.ftp-master.d.o: > > $ dak rm -Rn -a i386 lmms > W: -a/--architecture implies -p/--partial. > Will remove the following packages from unstable: > >lmms | 1.2.2+dfsg1-6 | source >

Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 5/20/24 5:23 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Also, one of the affected packages (lmms) currently FTBFS on i386: https://bugs.debian.org/1068155. Would it be possible to remove it from testing on i386 (or completely) so it doesn't block Qt migration? dak reports no rdeps on mirror.ftp-master.d.o:

Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > libpoppler134 has migrated to Testing and I don't see libpoppler126 > there any more so I'm closing the poppler transition bug. FWIW, I am waiting for a formal "tags -1 confirmed" from Sebastian. Also, one of the affected

Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-16 Thread Jeremy Bícha
libpoppler134 has migrated to Testing and I don't see libpoppler126 there any more so I'm closing the poppler transition bug. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 05/05/2024 23:33, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Control: retitle -1 transition: poppler 24.02 Control: affects -1 src:poppler Since originally requesting this transition, I have updated the version to 24.02. I believe all reverse dependencies can be binNMU'd for this. Go

Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: retitle -1 transition: poppler 24.02 Control: affects -1 src:poppler Since originally requesting this transition, I have updated the version to 24.02. I believe all reverse dependencies can be binNMU'd for this. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha