Rich,

Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1  x86_64 and getting:

$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs = 1.2.8.3-1.el6 for package:
389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for package:
389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0:1.2.8.3-1.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Conflict: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64 conflicts
selinux-policy-base < 3.9.7-11
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


Installed Packages
Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 3.7.19
Release     : 93.el6_1.2
Size        : 2.8 M
Repo        : installed
>From repo   : sl-security
Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
License     : GPLv2+
Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

My selinux policy too new?

Thanks,
Aaron Hagopian


On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
> > On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmegg...@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
> >>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
> >>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
> >>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
> >>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
> >> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version.  We
> will
> >> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.
> > Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation?
> Yes.  The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS
> customers.
> > Thanks again,
> >
> > --Amos
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to