OK the errors go away if I remove the jsf-impl.jar from the WEB-INF\lib
directory in the deployed war file in tomcat.

I believe the war file should not include the jsf-impl.jar. I wonder if the
demo pom file is not right.

Thanks,
Venkata

On 3/30/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Also Ven,

That error, although it should never show up if everything is configured
correctly, should not really effect things that badly.  It it logged
when something like the resource servlet tries to disable the
configurators after a FacesContext has already been obtained. All it
means is that configurators to handle file-uploads and whatnot will be
available on the external context and "may" cause some performance issues.

If after narrowing everything down to one version of Faces you still get
this message, then write up a JIRA ticket so we can investigate why.

Scott

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi Venk,
>
> the demo itself runs w/ MyFaces.
>
> Your stack is talking about Sun RI
>
> <snip>
> com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.
> </snip>
>
> You can't have two JSF impls in one app.
> The good news is, that JSF 1.2 removes the "odd" requirement for
> *adding* a JSF runtime to your projects, since the container ships it
> !
>
> HTH,
> Matze
>
> On 3/30/07, venkata guddanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am have issues running the latest trinidad trunk. In JDEV 10.1.3 I
>> get the
>> following error in console when I try to navigate to a page or click on
>> command components:
>>
>> Mar 29, 2007 4:19:24 PM
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.config.GlobalConfiguratorImpl_isDisabled
>>
>> WARNING: Configurator services were disabled after beginRequest was
>> executed.  Cannot disable configurator services
>>
>> If I deploy to tomcat 5.5, I get the following error on all component
>> samples:
>>
>> *exception*
>>
>> javax.servlet.ServletException: org.apache.jasper.JasperException:
>> Base is null: editor
>>         javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:154)
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._invokeDoFilter
(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:209)
>>
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl
(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:166)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(
TrinidadFilterImpl.java:139)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(
TrinidadFilter.java:92)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidaddemo.webapp.RedirectFilter.doFilter(
RedirectFilter.java:97)
>>
>>
>> *root cause*
>>
>> javax.faces.FacesException: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Base is
>> null: editor
>>
>> com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(
ExternalContextImpl.java:351)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.ExternalContextDecorator.dispatch(
ExternalContextDecorator.java:43)
>>
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.context.FacesContextFactoryImpl$OverrideDispatch.dispatch
(FacesContextFactoryImpl.java:258)
>>
>>
>> com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(
ViewHandlerImpl.java:152)
>>
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView
(ViewHandlerImpl.java:181)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(
RenderResponseExecutor.java:41)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java
:132)
>>
>>         javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:140)
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._invokeDoFilter
(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:209)
>>
>>
>>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl
(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:166)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(
TrinidadFilterImpl.java:139)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(
TrinidadFilter.java:92)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidaddemo.webapp.RedirectFilter.doFilter(
RedirectFilter.java:97)
>>
>>
>> These changes issues seem to be portal related. Am I missing some
>> configuration?
>>
>
>


Reply via email to