I'll comment in email on this.
I'm fine with 'tr'.
FYI, we voted that for our custom css properties, we are going to use
-tri-, in case that influences anyone.
-- Jeanne
Gabrielle Crawford wrote:
Thanks Matthias, Gunther,
I have opened an issue for this if anyone wants to comment there:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-168
Thanks,
Gabrielle
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On 9/8/06, Gabrielle Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This isn't the point of this email, but if anyone with committer status
is reading this, can you uncomment the link to the client validation
chapter here (I'll do it on my next patch otherwise)
trinidad\src\site\xdoc\devguide\index.xml
done
Anyway, Trinidad has some public javascript objects, for example
- Converter
- Validator
- FacesMessage
For some doc on these please see:
http://incubator.apache.org/adffaces/devguide/clientValidation.html
Anyway, I'm thinking these names seem a bit generic and in order to
ensure Trin's js names don't clash with the js names of Trin's users
I'm
wondering if people think it's a good idea to prefix the names with
"Tr"
or some other prefix. So for example
Maybe Converter/Validator is abit more generic than FacesMessage :)
- TrConverter
- TrValidator
- TrFacesMessage
Any votes that this is a good idea?
I think it's preferable to use a prefix rather than "Trinidad" since
this does affect the js size. Any preference for the prefix? Any votes
for the following or other suggestions?
"Tr"
"Tri"
"Trin"
I like the Tr prefix. sounds better than tri or even trin.
+1 on Tr
Thanks,
Gabrielle
