Depending on how you are doing this, it may or not be possible. You are talking BONDING, this is a protocol function, as to get 50 meg on a single connection speed test. Normally this is not needed, but it is possible. With DSL, its simple, assuming they support MLPPPoE, you just add a secondary DSL modem/line to the PPPoE Session and then you have a true bonded link. Simple easy and will work just fine.
As far as other tunneling etc., that makes it much harder. Plus with overhead you will lose some bandwidth, however, a few options. If you have a MT back where you have the bandwidth, i.e. it has capabilities of over 50 meg and you have another MT on multiple DSL or LTE connections. You can do OSPF load balancing, basically you build tunnels over each link (don’t really matter what kind) and then you use OSPF to pass data across tunnels. This does not give you 50 meg down on a single connection, but will get you 50 meg aggregate, as long as you have many customers behind that 50 meg it will work fine and will balance decently, but if you are wishing to get 50 meg downloads, that is basically only done though true bonding, or breaking the standards. There is a device that does break standards, but will aggregate links together, it does by breaking tcp standards, but it’s a mushroom networks box. They basically start two downloads one on each circuit and with the technology they start one at 50% and one a 0% and then they continue to deliver it to you aggregate. Several options, depending on what you want and require. Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 3:17 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router mainly interested as a proof of concept, but say you have a customer who needs 50m dia and you can only get 25m service (say DSL or LTE) I was interested in bonding them to provide redundancy and bonding using a remote mikrotik that can provide the tunneling and aggregation On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:29 AM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: Trying to visualize the use. If there is fiber, is it not connected to the world? This sounds like a way to cobble an upstream DIA and feed it into a fiber. From: Dennis Burgess via AF Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:20 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Cc: Dennis Burgess Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router Depends on the technology, can you load balance, sure, bonding is a different best and needs to be supported by your upstream.. Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik wan bonding using hosted router Has anyone bonded wan interfaces using another mikrotik hosted elsewhere? I.e. bonding multiple LTE or DSL connections on the wan of a remote mikrotik that is tunneled back to another router that has fiber? Best practices, what works? ________________________________ -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
