On 6/12/2015 8:46 AM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote: > Since we are already in WGLC, the WG Chairs probably will need to decide > the scope - if this is changed, I expect will anyway require a new WGLC. > Hopefully the new ID will help.
Here are my thoughts, with chair hat on. It's an Informational document (i.e. not Standards Track or BCP). It does have some advice about how not to break ECN, but it's not altering or changing any previous standards or BCPs about how devices, hosts, or applications behave. I think it correctly avoids using the 2119 capitalized words (SHOULD, MUST, etc.). There are some non-capitalized "must" and "should" words in section 5 when going through the high-level list of prerequisites for successful use of ECN, and in my opinion, this is one of the more useful parts of the document to summarize and bring the advice together. There's definitely a valid criticism that it isn't particularly specific about some details in this guidance, but I think that's probably desirable, as some are still being worked out, and would ultimately go into Standards Track and BCP documents from TSVWG or some other working group. I think as the AQM working group, the level of detail and strength of recommendations made in -04 are pretty much on the mark for what we should say. Certainly people should let us know during this Last Call if they feel otherwise. It can be something we explicitly ask the AD to confirm during their review too. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
