On 8/18/2015 6:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Roland Bless <roland.bl...@kit.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 10.08.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Wesley Eddy: >>> As chairs, Richard and I would like to start a 2-week working >>> group last call on the AQM characterization guidelines: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/ >>> >>> Please make a review of this, and send comments to the list or >>> chairs. Any comments that you might have will be useful to us, >>> even if it's just to say that you've read it and have no other >>> comments. >> >> "Unfortunately", we (Polina and I) did a thorough review, >> which is attached. TL;DR: from our point-of-view >> the I-D needs a major revision. > > I am so tired of this document that I can hardly bear to read it > again, but I agree with the majority of the comments. > > Sometimes I do wish we could do graphics and charts as the IEEE does. >
We can add any type of graphics that are necessary, they will just only show up in the PDF version of the RFC, with only references to the PDF version in the TXT copy. See, for instance: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc6687.pdf Are there particular figures that need to be added to this AQM document to strengthen it? -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
