On 02/20/2018 12:24 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Seems like I wasn't clear enough: > The goal is not to appease zsh - but a step closer to POSIX sh friendly. > > I've been staring and writing bash (closer to POSIX sh really) scripts > for over a decade, haven't seen what makes X cleaner over Y. > Yet that's subjective, unlike the original argument - consistency rules ;-)
If you're working for "POSIX sh friendly", why are you mentioning zsh in the first place? As for targeting POSIX sh, if you can do that then sure. I have personal scripts written for sh when it makes sense (and my /bin/sh is symlinked to dash, so I actually use sh). But yeah, consistency rules. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
