Am 02.12.18 um 20:34 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-projects:
On 12/2/18 1:33 PM, Michael Straube via arch-projects wrote:
There are two missing tags that are needed in rules added (back) in
commit e385ac93a354 (Restore and refactor accidentally removed tests).
Add back the missing tags.
Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <michael.stra...@posteo.de>
---
namcap-tags | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/namcap-tags b/namcap-tags
index 17b9506..70dabb2 100644
--- a/namcap-tags
+++ b/namcap-tags
@@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ depends-by-namcap-sight depends=(%s) :: Depends as namcap
sees them: depends=(%s
dconf-needed-for-glib-schemas :: needed for glib schemas
glib2-needed-for-gio-modules :: needed for GIO modules
hicolor-icon-theme-needed-for-hicolor-dir :: needed for hicolor theme
hierarchy
+shared-mime-info-needed :: needed for update-mime-database
+desktop-file-utils-needed :: needed for update-desktop-database
kdebase-runtime-needed %s :: needed for programs %s
java-runtime-needed %s :: found class files %s
libraries-needed %s %s :: libraries %s needed in files %s
Huh, why do these tests even exist? The fact that we have hooks for them
now, means that we never need to run either command at all. Applications
that need a desktop or mime database will already depend on the relevant
package, and packages that merely happen to be a provider of such files
should not care whether or not you have other applications that can make
use of them.
We don't even need to use NeedsTargets, so it doesn't matter when the
hook runs. It can be run in the future at any time.
I was also wondering and do not know why these tests were added (back).
