----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11291 -----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#comment20917> What happened to residue and params.transport? We really should test expected results for parameters after phone-context. This would ensure the code does what is expected now, and that future changes do not cause unexpected changes. /trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#comment20913> This name is exposed through asterisk CLI, so say don't change it (especially since this has nothing to do with your change). If you want to cleanup test names that should be a separate review, and cleanup all chan_sip test names. I'm not sure anyone will want to bother changing the names, it is of little benefit and could possibly break someone's test script. /trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#comment20918> Why change this from !ast_strlen_zero(name)? - Corey Farrell On March 19, 2014, 5:01 a.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 19, 2014, 5:01 a.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers, Corey Farrell, lmadensen, Matt > Jordan, and wdoekes. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-17179 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17179 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Implements RFC-3966 TEL URI incoming INVITE. > > See https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17179 for a description > of the original isssue. > > I have been patching all versions since Asterisk 1.6. I would like to include > the code into the main trunk for version 13. > > Previously Asterisk was failing with error on incoming IMS call: > > Nov 13 17:52:05 NOTICE[27459]: chan_sip.c:6973 check_user_full: From address > missing 'sip:', using it anyway > > Nov 13 17:52:05 WARNING[27459]: chan_sip.c:6525 get_destination: Huh? Not a > SIP header (tel:0987654321;phone-context=+32987654321)? > > Reason: tel: protocol was not recognized. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /trunk/channels/sip/reqresp_parser.c 410429 > /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 410429 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Executed an incoming TEL URI INVITE connection. > CLI was present on the display and in the CDR file. > No errors on SIP debug output. > > > File Attachments > ---------------- > > RFC-3966 tel URI patch > > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt > > > Thanks, > > Geert Van Pamel > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
