> On March 20, 2014, 10:01 p.m., rmudgett wrote: > > /branches/12/main/sorcery.c, lines 777-779 > > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3326/diff/5/?file=56181#file56181line777> > > > > Should a duplicate wizard be considered a failure here? If so we > > should: > > res = sorcery_apply_wizard_mapping() > > if (res != success) > > break
No, a duplicate wizard isn't a failure here. - Mark ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3326/#review11309 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 17, 2014, 8:31 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3326/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 17, 2014, 8:31 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > When performing some realtime tests, I noticed that the AMI command > PJSIPShowEndpoints was listing all of my endpoints twice. This is because > ast_sorcery_apply_config() was being called twice from res_pjsip code, once > when initializing system configuration, and once again when initializing the > rest of the configuration data. This patch aims to fix the problem on two > fronts: > > 1) Remove the ast_sorcery_apply_config() calls from the PJSIP code entirely > in favor of having sorcery automatically apply configuration for the module > when sorcery is opened. This reduces the chance of accidentally attempting to > apply the same configuration twice. I also removed the call to > ast_sorcery_apply_config from res_mwi_external since it is no longer > necessary either. > > 2) Adjust sorcery_apply_wizard_mapping() not to apply the same wizard to an > object type more than once, just in case someone does make the error of > calling ast_sorcery_apply_config() multiple times for the same object type. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/12/tests/test_sorcery_realtime.c 410696 > /branches/12/tests/test_sorcery_astdb.c 410696 > /branches/12/tests/test_sorcery.c 410696 > /branches/12/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_configuration.c 410696 > /branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_system.c 410696 > /branches/12/res/res_mwi_external.c 410696 > /branches/12/main/sorcery.c 410696 > /branches/12/include/asterisk/sorcery.h 410696 > /branches/12/configs/sorcery.conf.sample 410696 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3326/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > My tests of retrieving data from realtime now get the expected objects. I > don't have any automated tests to post yet because the realtime testsuite is > a work in progress. > > > Thanks, > > Mark Michelson > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
