Michelle Dupuis wrote: > Wow, an answer phrased in the form of a flame... > > A more supportive tone might actually encourage the Asterisk userbase to > grow! > Okay, if you really want a more constructive answer.
The addition to asterisk was an API change to allow app_fax from asterisk-addons to talk to asterisk. app_fax uses spandsp. Why on earth would you want to eliminiate the need for spandsp? It would involve re-doing really a lot of work, and spandsp is one of the finest pieces of coding to be associated with asterisk. Is that supportive enough? Bug ID #0011761 looks more interesting. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
