-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:21 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fwd: [asterisk-r2] MFCR2 With Unicall - canunicall affect zaptel commands?
The message includes a host of irrelevant and relevant information. The question is not clear. It is a horrible piece of top-posting mess. Please provide the relevant configuration again and clarify your answer. What hardware do you have? What connections do you have? Are they working OK? Generally chan_zap and chan_unicall should not handle the same spans -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir Forwarded message ---------- From: Juan Carlos Huerta <juancarloshue...@gmail.com> Date: 07-abr-2009 13:41 Subject: Re: [asterisk-r2] MFCR2 With Unicall - can unicall affect zaptel commands? To: asterisk...@lists.digium.com Please wirte to asterisk-users@lists.digium.com to get help about this problem. Juan Carlos ~ Lo que no te mata te fortalece ~ On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Giovanny Magallanes <gmagalla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Juan Carlos. > > > > Yes, I still can t type the commands in the asterisk console . I dont have > > dial tone for FXS ports . > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Giovanni. > > > > > > 2009/4/7, Juan Carlos Huerta <juancarloshue...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >> And what is the result? still with zap commands problem? >> >> >> >> Juan Carlos >> >> ~ Lo que no te mata te fortalece ~ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Giovanny Magallanes >> >> <gmagalla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > I did it: >>> >> > >>> >> > elastix*CLI> load chan_zap.so >>> >> > The 'load' command is deprecated and will be removed in a future >>> >> > release. >>> >> > Please use 'module load' instead. >>> >> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found >>> >> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata_additional.conf': Found >>> >> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata-channels.conf': Found >>> >> > -- Registered channel 63, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 64, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 65, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 66, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 67, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 68, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 68, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 69, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 70, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 71, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 72, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 73, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 74, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 75, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 76, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 77, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > -- Registered channel 78, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>> >> > elastix*CLI> >>> >> > >>> >> > Thank you Juan >>> >> > >>> >> > Giovanni >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > 2009/4/7, Juan Carlos Huerta <juancarloshue...@gmail.com>: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Try to load the chan_zap.so module manually to see if you get some >>>> >> >> error. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Juan Carlos >>>> >> >> ~ Lo que no te mata te fortalece ~ >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Giovanny Magallanes >>>> >> >> <gmagalla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > I'm using Elastix 1.1-8 with: >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > asterisk-1.4.19 >>>>> >> >> > spandsp-0.0.4 >>>>> >> >> > unicall-0.0.5pre1 >>>>> >> >> > zaptel-1.4.9.2 >>>>> >> >> > unicall-0.0.5pre1 >>>>> >> >> > libmfcr2-0.0.3 >>>>> >> >> > libsupertone-0.0.2 >>>>> >> >> > libunicall-0.0.3 >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Regards, >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Giovanni >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > 2009/4/7, Giovanny Magallanes <gmagalla...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> Ok, Thanks. The chan_zap commands are unavailable, but unicall >>>>>> >> >> >> commands >>>>>> >> >> >> and my E1 MFC/R2 are OK. >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> Giovanni >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> 2009/4/7, Moises Silva <moises.si...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>> I don't understand your problem. And no, unicall has nothing to do >>>>>>> >> >> >>> with chan_zap.so commands. >>>>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>> Please, in the future, don't hijack threads, open a new thread for >>>>>>> >> >> >>> your discussion. This time I changed the subject already. >>>>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>> Moy >>>>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Giovanny Magallanes >>>>>>> >> >> >>> <gmagalla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > Hi, Guys. >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > I did not type any zaptel commands in asterisk console. I have >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > installed >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > Elastix 1.1-8 with unicall and it is working fine with a Digium >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > TE212-P. >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > [r...@elastix asterisk]# find -P / -name chan_zap.so >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > /usr/src/astunicall-1.4.19-0.1/asterisk-1.4.19/channels/chan_zap.so >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > [r...@elastix asterisk]# >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > elastix*CLI> load chan_zap.so >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata_additional.conf': Found >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata-channels.conf': Found >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > -- Registered channel 63, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > -- Registered channel 64, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > -- Registered channel 65, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > -- Registered channel 66, FXO Kewlstart signalling >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > Can unicall affect zaptel commands in asterisk?? >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > Thanks >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > Giovanni Magallanes >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >> >>> > 2009/4/6, Fernando Berretta <fernando.berre...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> I've installed Asterisk 1.4 and Openr2 1.1 all is working well. >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> I've >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> connected a crossover cable to TE122 board and board lite has >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> went >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> green. But when I've tried to make a call, I've got the >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> following >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> trace: >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:218] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - Call started at >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Mon >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Apr >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 6 15:35:00 2009 on chan 1 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:218] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - CAS Tx >> [SEIZE] >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x00 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:218] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - CAS Raw Tx >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x01 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:242] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - Bits changed from >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x08 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> to >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x00 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:242] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - CAS Rx << [FORCED >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> RELEASE] 0x00 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:242] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - Disconnection >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> before >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> seize ack detected![15:35:00:242] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> - >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Far >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> end disconnected. Reason: Forced Release >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:245] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - Attempting to >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> cancel >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> timer timer 0 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:245] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - Cannot cancel >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> timer >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:245] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - CAS Tx >> [CLEAR >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> FORWARD] >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x08 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:245] [Thread: 3078437776] [Chan 1] - CAS Raw Tx >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x09 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:306] [Thread: 3081632656] [Chan 1] - Bits changed from >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x00 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> to >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x08 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:306] [Thread: 3081632656] [Chan 1] - CAS Rx << [IDLE] >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0x08 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:306] [Thread: 3081632656] [Chan 1] - Call ended >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:306] [Thread: 3081632656] [Chan 1] - Attempting to >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> cancel >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> timer timer 0 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> [15:35:00:306] [Thread: 3081632656] [Chan 1] - Cannot cancel >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> timer >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> 0 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Is there some way to complete a call through crossover cable >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> with >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> R2 ? >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> How should I configure dahdi ? >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> Fernando >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> >> > What is the advantage of having to scroll this far down to see what a > bottom > poster had to say? It is really so simple on two points: 1) If you have not been following this thread it makes catching up a natural process, start at the top and read your way down instead of scrolling to the bottom and then reading up, even though any idiot is capable of scrolling this seems to be a big issue to some. 2) and I can not say this emphatically enough: Etiquette and Courtesy Most lists of this type are bottom post list and whether you like it or not it is and has been for some time(in internet time) the proper way of posting. There have been so many flame wars on this subject it is absolutely ridiculous. I have been reading (OK maybe trolling)since the days of Asterisk 0.9 and the majority of people are bottom posters. I would have to say that those people that I have seen through the years who have given the best, most concise, and clear help were nearly all in the habit of bottom posting. There is also the practice of clipping the signature and other unnecessary information so that the post doesn't get out of hand. But this in no way helps the OP so this will be my last comment on this subject on this thread. -- JohnM _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users