Danny Nicholas wrote: > "Gentlemens clubs" usually don't have any. While LH probably has a valid > point, jumping on Til isn't the way to bring it home. You can't protect the > stupid or lazy from themselves. If you can't do this right, pay someone > else to.
You're suggesting that if I pay someone they'll be able to get the default setting for allowguest changed to "no" ? I could be wrong, but I don't generally consider myself stupid or lazy... and yet this default setting as "yes" took me by surprise, obviously. So either I am stupid or lazy or there is a risk here that can catch even others off-guard. I've been down this contribution road-path a half-dozen times before with Asterisk. So forgive me if I don't play it out to the final futile note. In ESR's CatB there's the idea where the maintainer encourages (and wants) bug reporting, feedback, and other non-code forms of contribution (as well as code contributions). He refers to it as grooming co-developers. That's not how Asterisk development works... here you can contribute if you're already in the meritocracy, but if you're not, then you have more than a difficult time in trying to even contribute in small non-monetary ways. So anyway, I've been down this road a half-dozen times already, and it ends up being futile, frustrating, and time-consuming. I'm too busy today to be interested in playing. Thanks, Lee. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users