My Asterisk 1.4.19 happily excepts up to 80 concurrent calls (the most I've 
seen so far) which sends the CPU load up to ~20% on a fairly old server. In our 
busiest period, from 8 to 8:05 I see up to 200 incoming calls, somewhat less 
than one call/second.

My superiors want to expand and increase the number of clients significantly 
and the scalability of Asterisk is beginning to worry me. Someone mentioned a 
"roof" of 250 CC in Asterisk after which stability and call quality becomes 
increasingly affected.

My plan is to implement load-balancing using DUNDi with one extra server 
initially, and a second available on site for further expansion. This should 
enable me to accommodate ten times our current load without any significant 
problems (I hope!), and adding more servers is fairly easy (although I guess 
there are diminishing returns?).

When it comes to the long term I must admit I am increasingly looking at trying 
out FreeSwitch, the configuration might be trickier but scalability is much 
higher on my list of priorities.

Fra: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] På vegne af virendra bhati
Sendt: 7. februar 2012 12:38
Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Emne: [asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch

Hi List,

Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What 
technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the right 
or wrong but this question come to my mind...

--

Thanks and regards

 Virendra Bhati
+91-8885268942
Software Engineer
E-mail-: virbh...@gmail.com<mailto:virbh...@gmail.com>
Skype id:- virbhati2



--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
               http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to