-----Original Message----- From: Rafael dos Santos Saraiva <rafaels...@gmail.com> Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance Asterisk large installation on Vmware/Xen Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:01:06 -0300
Hi I would like the opinion of you and if anyone has a similar scenario. I have a project for installation of a Asterisk server in a client with about 400 extensions. My question is whether this scenario carry an Asterisk virtualized. Will be used only extensions and trunks sip sip, 1 queue with 2 agents, without call recording. It is best to use XEN or VMware? Which best version of Asterisk for this scenario? _____________________________________________________ Use XEN in paravirtualized mode: NOT hardware/full virtualized! Even when using specialized drivers, you get a considerable performance hit. When virtualizing Linux, hw-virtualization is an unneeded waste of cpu-cycles. Acceptable for windows clients, not otherwise. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
