As you've probably discovered, most of the API toolkits are half baked and poorly maintained. The Java interface is not great for performance and is suffering from the above too.
>From our experience (including customer specific and commercial apps) using >the AMI directly is the best way to go. Next you also have to develop in a >language suitable to the throughput needs of whatever you are building. If >you need performance, I'd recommend developing in C++ and building your own >AMI interface to suit your needs. (If you use boost or Qt then it will speed >your development time). This topic might step on troll territory (which ____ is best) so feel free to email me off list if you want more info. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
