On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Jerry Geis <jerry.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found dahdi_test... > > dahdi_test > Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... > 99.999% 99.904% 99.974% 99.814% 98.070% 97.850% 99.985% 99.887% > 99.708% 99.899% 99.805% 99.708% 99.902% 100.000% 99.949% 99.883% > 99.891% 99.906% 99.784% 99.719% 99.827% 99.903% > --- Results after 22 passes --- > Best: 100.000% -- Worst: 97.850% -- Average: 99.698465% > Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 99.991 > > seems like low numbers and not even running audio at this time. > > I'm thinking with the PRI card removed there is no reliable timing source. > > How do I get ConfBridge to have a reliable timing source? > > Information on timing sources can be found here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Timing+Interfaces As noted on that page, ConfBridge can use any timing interface Asterisk provides, and is not limited to the DAHDI timing interface. Generally, timerfd is a good timing interface. That aside, I would try to rule out external issues with the garbled audio before changing the timing source. Things like: - Analysis of the RTP traffic (along with potential jitter) - CPU utilization with an active conference (95% idle doesn't mean that some core isn't pegged) - Any potential transcoding issues or codec issues Matt -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | CTO 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users