At the moment, I can't see any differences here. sha512sum is identical.
Regards
Michael
On 08.07.23 at 01:50 Jean-Denis Girard wrote:
Le 07/07/2023 à 12:49, Joshua C. Colp a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:40 PM Jean-Denis Girard <jd.gir...@sysnux.pf
<mailto:jd.gir...@sysnux.pf>> wrote:
There seems to be a problem with the tar.gz archive on github. It's
correct on downloads.asterisk.org <http://downloads.asterisk.org>.
Can you be more specific? They are identical and the same tarball. I just
downloaded both from each place and confirmed that, and confirmed they both
extract fine.
Downloading from github (I tried 5 times), I get:
10353870 7 juil. 13:44 'asterisk-20.3.1(1).tar.gz'
10353870 7 juil. 13:46 'asterisk-20.3.1(2).tar.gz'
sha256sum is:
aec7271fda5eb1e185bb94f3f52977c636783bd456e9c361dd853cd0eba10203
Extracting is fine.
Downloading from asterisk.org, I get:
28176262 7 juil. 11:34 asterisk-20.3.1.tar.gz
5d7dea82b11ce97eec294ba0234c3a68fe2f05065c04a4279baa4a4442f4f628
Bien cordialement,
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
New to Asterisk? Start here:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
