>> (1) leave the document as it is; >> (2) add a mention that implementation of Blake2S is RECOMMENDED (SHOULD); >> (3) add a mention that implementation of Blake2B is RECOMMENDED; >> (4) add a mention that implementation of both 2B and 2S is RECOMMENDED.
> I'm in favour of (2). Where is Blake2S-based HMAC defined? RFC 7693 merely says: BLAKE2 does not require a special "HMAC" (Hashed Message Authentication Code) construction for keyed message authentication as it has a built-in keying mechanism. but it does not appear to clearly define the HMAC construction. _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
