Hi! (Please reply to our talk mailing list and not news as the later is just for announcements. I have forwarded your previous replies there but please check any further followups to go there.)
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan <aa...@lo-res.org> wrote: > On Jun 12, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I believe the dot(1) format is usually sufficient as an abstract layer to > describe > the networks (for visualization purposes). Not really as we do not have graphviz available on all platforms. > and of course you can visualize it via Java on the phone itself You can? You know of a decent visualization library in Java for a dot format? Then this could really be a good intermediate format. But I thought we would just use some lib and feed it with whatever (do not know which one for Java, though). This is really not protocol specific - once you have a topology graph at hand it does not really matter if you use dot or not. >> Oh, and happy learning Slovenian ;-) > > Well, french would be just as hard to learn ;-) But there is probably a little more benefit from learning French than Slovenian which is (badly) spoken by only 2 million people. It is like learning a Parisian dialect. ;-) Mitar _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users