Hi! On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@pps.jussieu.fr> wrote: > without asking us for permission. > > I find that rude.
This is the whole point of free software and culture movement: that you can do things with the work without having to ask the author for permission. That author states the rules and you can then do whatever you want without asking for permission if you play by that rules. This is *the main idea*. If you find this rude, then, sorry, you do not get the philosophy. Then you still live in the world of copyright where everything should be allowed by the copyright holder. And as far as I understood, they have contacted you. So they are doing even more then required. Required in the legal sense and also moral sense: because it cold be also morally implied that you accept GPLing your code because you licensed it initially in the way you did. For me this is a bit funny, very similar happened at our university, when professor gave his code under GPL, he didn't want to be bothered with this "earthly" things like licensing, just wanted code there. And then once somebody used this commercially he discovered that he does not like somebody benefiting from the code without he getting anything from that. He really found that rude. Not paying him? How they dare! Mitar _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users