If you work with atomic route replacement even putting ALL of them into a netlink message (or as many as you can fit in) works.
Henning On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Matthieu Boutier <bout...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: >>> I agree, but I would like to know how many packets we lose. Since the >>> remove/insert happen in quick succession, I'd expect it to be very few. > … >> and the context switch and what little work it does alone - costs >> 80Mbits of forwarding, > > What about putting multiple netlink messages in one datagram? > Will perhaps do that. :-) > > Remark: error handling become more tricky -- but for just 2 messages it > should be fine. > > Matthieu > > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
