In a message dated 12/9/2004 10:35:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thus, for example, after reading the Dear Max,
I did find, much to my surprise, that this was true of the majority of the
participants in my own study circle. Even though most of the participants had
college degrees, they just couldn't 'get' this part which seemed obvious to me
from the start. I realized at that point I was vastly overestimating the ability
of most Baha'is to read a text. My son made that point as well when he voiced
his disagreement with me over Ruhi. "Mom," he says, "the Writings are hard to
read." I was surprised because Neil had been reading these texts fluently in
Feast since he was eight. It never occurred to me that he might not be
understanding them.
"It is quite likely that by first developing in
believers who are in the early stages of their study of the Faith a capacity to focus attention on the immediate and explicit meaning of sentences they read from the Holy Writings, we will be contributing to the achievement of unity of thought in our communities" I guess the question is will that 'unity of thought' not then be a
literalistic one? And is that really what our Writings encourage?
warmest, Susan
|
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Michael Alcorn
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Dick Detweiler
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Dick Detweiler
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck