On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 08:29:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > >In any case, if the Bible has not been substantially changed in any
> > > way,
> > > then the genocidal commandments in the Bible are actually from
> > > God, and then
> > > you have to find some sort of way to justify or explain
> > > such behavior
> > > through progressive revelation.

> >  But if you do apply certain minimal moral
> > > standards to the children of
> > > Israel then their behavior was unacceptable and
> > > couldn't have
> > > originated with God, and so those commandments in the Old
> > > TEstament
> > > must have had some other source.
> 
> > Gilberto:
> > Which assumptions don't stand up? And even if you are going to open up
> > your mind and heart to the divine, is it true that it speaks
> > everywhere equally? I mean, if a book endorses genocide can you
> > seriously accept it wholeheartedly as scripture?

Dave:
> The very first sentence, "if...then..."  draws an illogical 
> conclusion.  The
> second thought, "...if you apply certain minimal moral standards....then
> their behavior...." also rests on insufficient logic. 


Gilberto:
Logic is a funny thing. I think that standard deductive logic is often
valuable but it needs axioms in order to say anything worthwhile. So I
would agree with you that perhaps what I wrote rests on certain
statements which haven't been proven (at least not in the context of
our discussions), but I would still say those statements were
reasonable (i.e. likely to be true).

In terms of what the Bible says about genocide we can get to that in a
sec but then there was your other comment that.


> Now, in speaking of opening the mind and heart to the divine, if the only
> example you can conceive is one involving the endorsement of genocide, don't
> you think there's something wrong with that picture?


I'm not sure what you mean. We live in a world where there are various
belief systems which say various things. Not everything they teach
necessarily comes from God. Some belief systems are wrong.

The Quran, the Bible, the Tao Te Ching, How to Win Friends and
Influence People, Mein Kapf, a Course in Miracles, the Talmud, the
Bhagavad-Gita, the Communist Manifesto, etc.

These books aren't all equal, they aren't all from God. I'm not sure
why being open to the divine should mean believing everything in every
book.
But to address your concerns about the Bible and genocide, could you
help me find a different way to read these passages?

Deuteronomy 7
[1] 
"When the LORD your God brings you into the land which you are
entering to take possession of it, and clears away many nations before
you, the Hittites, the Gir'gashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the
Per'izzites, the Hivites, and the Jeb'usites, seven nations greater
and mightier than yourselves,
[2] and when the LORD your God gives them over to you, and you defeat
them; then you must utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant
with them, and show no mercy to them.
[3] You shall not make marriages with them, giving your daughters to
their sons or taking their daughters for your sons.
[4] For they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve
other gods; then the anger of the LORD would be kindled against you,
and he would destroy you quickly.



Deuteronomy 20

[The verses right before this passage say that in cities not in the
promised land, if the city surrenders they enslave everyone. If the
city resists, they kill all the men and enslave the women and
children.]

[16] But in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God gives
you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes,
[17] but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the
Amorites, the Canaanites and the Per'izzites, the Hivites and the
Jeb'usites, as the LORD your God has commanded;
[18] that they may not teach you to do according to all their
abominable practices which they have done in the service of their
gods, and so to sin against the LORD your God.

And then if you looked at the entire book of Joshua you would read
about how the army of the children of Israel went from city to city
and killed everything that had breath. Men, women, children, infants,
the elderly and livestock.

And then later, under the reign of Saul, we can read in 1 Samuel 15
what God's intentions are towards Amalek

And Samuel says to Saul:
[2] Thus says the LORD of hosts, `I will punish what Am'alek did to
Israel in opposing them on the way, when they came up out of Egypt.
[3] Now go and smite Am'alek, and utterly destroy all that they have;
do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling,
ox and sheep, camel and ass.'"

And then Saul defeats them in battle but fall short:

7] And Saul defeated the Amal'ekites, from Hav'ilah as far as Shur,
which is east of Egypt.
[8] And he took Agag the king of the Amal'ekites alive, and utterly
destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.
[9] But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep and
of the oxen and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good,
and would not utterly destroy them; all that was despised and
worthless they utterly destroyed.
[10] The word of the LORD came to Samuel: 
[11] "I repent that I have made Saul king; for he has turned back from
following me, and has not performed my commandments." And Samuel was
angry; and he cried to the LORD all night.

So Saul is ordered to utterly destroy the people of Amalek and
everything that they have. And then is scolded by God because he held
back and didn't destroy everyone and everything.


>  On the other hand, if
> you are stating that the Bible as a whole endorses genocide, then I simply
> have to disagree with you.  Strongly.

I would say that if the above passage (including the book of Joshua)
is a non-trivial chunk of the Bible and if they are inspired
revelation then that strongly implies that there are times when
genocide is not only permitted but required and commanded by God.


Actually, even in the traditional rabbinic breakdown of the 613
commandments of the Torah, the genocidal ones are still explicitly
listed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_mitzvot

596 - 600
Destroy the seven Canaanite nations Deut. 20:17 
Not to let any of them remain alive Deut. 20:16 
Wipe out the descendants of Amalek Deut. 25:19 
Remember what Amalek did to the Jewish people Deut. 25:17 
Not to forget Amalek's atrocities and ambush on our journey from Egypt
in the desert Deut. 25:19

I'm not sure how to basically get around the claim that at least some
parts of the Bible really do endorse genocide.
How would you do it?

And then how do you respond to those texts. I mean, I would just stick
to their plain meaning, apply the minimal moral standard that
"genocide is always wrong" and conclude that those parts of the Bible
couldn't have come from God.

If you accept those passages as inspired, then somehow you have to
accept genocide into your notion of progressive revelation.


Peace

Gilberto

"My people are hydroponic"

__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Reply via email to