On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Tom Harding <t...@thinlink.com> wrote: > It's not difficult to > imagine real-world consequences to not having contributed to the > transaction.
I'm having a hard time. Can you help me understand a specific case where this makes a difference. It appears to be a gratuitous requirement; if I have another unused input that happens to be larger by the required fee-- why not just use it? The inherent malleability of signatures makes it unreliable to depend on the signature content of a transaction until its good and buried, regardless. And an inability to replace an input means you could not RBF for additional fees without taking change in more cases; there ought to be a benefit to that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
