Please ping me if it ends up being 103. I don't like missing things in the beta release post.
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:23:37 AM UTC-7 and...@chromium.org wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 7:45 PM Joe Medley <jme...@google.com> wrote: > >> Are you aiming for 102? >> > > That's branching very soon, so definitely not. I'm not really aiming for > any particular release. But if you want a prediction anyway, then likely > 104. > > >> >> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 7:17:45 AM UTC-7 Emilio Cobos Alvarez wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 4/11/22 15:02, Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: >>> > Ah, I'm not familiar with that way of doing compat research. What >>> would >>> > we gain from doing that vs. regular use-counter + HTTP Archive? >>> > >>> > Do we expect those 0.1% to visibly break? (I guess that depends on >>> > what they're feature testing for..) >>> > >>> > >>> > I would not expect that at all based on the HTTP Archive query. If >>> > testing against "not all" was commonplace, I'd expect more results >>> > beyond the two Yandex scripts. Or, perhaps it is commonplace, but it >>> > happens mostly on features that actually *are* supported at the >>> moment. >>> > >>> > Just as an example (and to show that "not all" testing isn't a myth), >>> > one of the few (non-Yandex-script) sites that did show up was >>> > https://ww.sapo.pt <https://ww.sapo.pt>, which does the following: >>> > >>> > if(rule.mediaText.includes("not all") || ...) >>> > >>> > By the looks of it, it's an early-out related to the theme switching, >>> > which prevents the code from amending the query if >>> prefers-color-scheme >>> > is not supported. Had we not supported prefers-color-scheme, then I >>> > think the worst that could happen is that we end up with a more >>> > complicated query that still ultimately evaluates to false. Testing >>> the >>> > page with the feature enabled (with and without dark mode preference), >>> > their color switcher still works normally. >>> > >>> > That is just one site though, it's probably theoretically possible to >>> > write *something* that breaks. I did try to look at the "sample URLs" >>> > for the counters, but I couldn't actually reproduce the counters being >>> hit. >>> >>> >>> It's a thing that even Google DevRel people have recommended in the >>> past, ftr :) >>> >>> https://web.dev/prefers-color-scheme/#supporting-dark-mode >>> >>> > Ouch ... > > >> But if you have data to indicate this is not a problem in the wild I'd >>> be happy to implement it in Gecko after you ship this change. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- Emilio >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/87a783d4-dbd7-4b0c-8ba1-7a118a87d759n%40chromium.org.
