Hi Paolo, all, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > On 27/05/2022 12:31, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Process-wise, my call to work out a proposal how to come to a joint > > text (in a small circle) is still open. > > I've asked many times but still no answer. Will you one day explain why you > keep wanting to have this process behind closed doors? > It was right there in one of my emails you were answering to; let me paste it:
Thorsten wrote: > It is one option to make effective progress. As you state, it > appears that all people with an opinion have spoken up here; what's > now left to do, is to come up with a document, for which many (if > not all) directors can stand behind it. If community members like > Michael Weghorn or Michael Meeks would like to be part of that > working group, we should of course consider that, too. > What we ideally need, is *one* consolidated proposal. I'm grateful for Kendy taking the initiative, and starting one. > It's quite clear that there are 2 proposals now as the changes proposed > completely change the initial one. > Then lets please interact with the changes, such that we can iterate this to a single joint text. Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
