--- Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The C++ standard requires that a copy of an allocator is equivalent > to the original.
> Right. If your allocators can't be copied safely then you have a > problem. Peter's approach is one way to fix the problem. But I > don't see that shared_ptr has a problem. All I am trying to say is that shared_ptr doesn't specify any requirements on its Deleter parameter. shared_ptr's Deleter is not a C++ standard's allocator. shared_ptr *does* have a problem because it doesn't set any standards for the Deleter type like C++ does for Allocator. It is just one example of the inconsistent memory management concept in boost that should be sorted out eventually. Eugene __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
