Follow-up Comment #9, bug #22923 (project make):
I agree with comment #2 that polling pipes would incur unnecessary overhead
and that the generic solution would pair each spawned action against the
pre-defined template of a "logger" command.
Looking at the recipient of messages in the existing implementation, it's the
file system. Perhaps, another generic approach could be a file system driver
that translates the "open" and "write" operations from separate processes
using a pre-defined template of a "logger" command and/or sending the contents
directly to an established network log service.
I agree that extra line buffering and line splitting may need to be
implemented.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?22923>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
