--- peternilsson42 wrote: > So you made absolutely _no_ change to the semantics of > that assignment!
I fixed the signal to make others happy. > You seem to be only interested in one class of machine. > why do you think that? Or, > do you think different values should be displayed? My previous reference was: "The three forms of the IMUL instruction are similar in that the length of the product is calculated to twice the length of the operands." (Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Instruction Set Reference A-M, Order Number 253666) Now I saw: "An example of undefined behavior is the behavior on integer overflow." (ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E)) It is mathematically obvious the Intel's approach. I thought it applied wherever it is possible.
