The geometry targets for protein are well established (by which I mean "agreed upon") and so the distribution


On 18/03/2021 07:19, Cyril Hamiaux wrote:

Dear Jasmine (and all),

Many thanks for the article. I have a question regarding the Z cutoffs used to flag geometry outliers in the PDB validation reports: geometry outliers are flagged with |Z|>2 for ligands (including carbohydrates), but with |Z|>5 for proteins. What is the rational for using different criteria for ligands vs proteins? After all isn’t this just one structure?


The geometry targets for protein are well established (by which I mean "agreed upon") and so we can presume that the distribution for refinement is similar to that of the validation. One cannot say as much for ligands at the moment. the wwPDB wants to flag only what they have confidence are wrong. In the CCP4 world, yes, it's all homogeneous (or that is the intent (carbohydrates in particular need some attention in the monomer library (I'd recommend that you just run Acedrg to update the dictionaries (or use Coot, where this have been done for you))), but the wwPDB doesn't score with CCP4 software (not today at least).


PS. I am refining a 2.4 A resolution structure of a N-glycosylated protein and end up with a large number of geometry outliers for the sugars when I generate PDB validation reports (especially angle outliers).

Are you using/did you use the N-linked glycan builder in Coot? because this really shouldn't happen if you are (it uses modern Acedrg-based dictionaries). If not, you can still use "Refine Tree" and it should (might?) do something helpful.


The huge majority of these outliers are flagged with |Z|<5 (ie they would not be flagged if they were protein bonds or angles). The electron density for the sugars is quite good and I made sure that correct LINKR records are used during refinement in Refmac. I must admit that I’m a bit struggling to improve this.


Refmac can report distance deviations, so you can see where the restraints are fighting the density.

You can do something similar in Coot too.


Paul.



*From:*CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> *On Behalf Of *Jasmine Young
*Sent:* Thursday, 18 March 2021 2:46 am
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* [ccp4bb] Enhanced Validation of Small-Molecule Ligands and Carbohydrates

A new article in /Structure/<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2021.02.004>describes new features, including branched representations and 2D SNFG images for carbohydrates, identification of ligands of interest, 3D views of electron density fit, and 2D images of small molecule geometry.

These enhancements and processes for validation of 3D small-molecular structures reflect recommendations from the wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop and the adoption of software through community collaborations.

This manuscript also highlights enhancements made since the initial implementation of Validation Reports as described in Validation of the Structures in the Protein Data Bank (2017) Structure 25: 1916-1927 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009>.

*Enhanced Validation of Small-Molecule Ligands and Carbohydrates in the Protein Data Bank * Zukang Feng, John D. Westbrook, Raul Sala, Oliver S. Smart, Gérard Bricogne, Masaaki Matsubara, Issaku Yamada, Shinichiro Tsuchiya, Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita, Jeffrey C. Hoch, Genji Kurisu, Sameer Velankar, Stephen K. Burley, and Jasmine Y. Young (2021) Structure doi: 10.1016/j.str.2021.02.004<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2021.02.004>

undefined<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2021.02.004>


<http://www.wwpdb.org/news/news?year=2021#top>

--
Regards,
Jasmine
===========================================================
Jasmine Young, Ph.D.
Biocuration Team Lead
RCSB Protein Data Bank
Research Professor
Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
174 Frelinghuysen Rd
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087
Email: jasm...@rcsb.rutgers.edu  <mailto:jasm...@rcsb.rutgers.edu>
Phone: (848)445-0103 ext 4920
Fax: (732)445-4320
===========================================================

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and may be subject to legal 
privilege.
  If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disseminate, 
distribute or
  reproduce all or any part of this e-mail or attachments.  If you have 
received this
  e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete all material pertaining 
to this
  e-mail.  Any opinion or views expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
individual
  sender and may not represent those of The New Zealand Institute for Plant and
  Food Research Limited.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to