On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:23 PM Yuri Weinstein <ywein...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Update.
> Seeking approvals/reviews for:
>
> rados - Radek, Laura, Travis, Adam King (see Laura's comments below)
> rgw - Casey approved
> fs - Venky approved
> rbd - Ilya

No issues in RBD, formal approval is pending on [1] which also spills
into RADOS (same job, I believe).

> krbd - Ilya

Approved.

>
> upgrade/nautilus-x (pacific) - fixed by Casey
> upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Adam King is looking
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64279
>
> upgrade/pacific-x (quincy) - blocked by
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64256 (Laura, Dan, Adam pls take a
> look)
>
> upgrade/pacific-p2p - Ilya PTL (maybe rbd related?)

I can answer only for test_librbd_python.sh failures -- 3 out of 5 jobs
there.  They popped up because these jobs are running tests from 16.2.7
against librbd from pacific-release (i.e. almost 16.2.15).  One of the
tests happened to pass an incorrect argument and was adjusted together
with the fix for the bug in question [2].

A different variation of this came up in [3] earlier.

I don't think there is any way to fix this other than to disable
test_rbd.TestImage.test_diff_iterate test in upgrades.  We can't
account for such version mismatches when writing tests.

[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64126
[2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63846
[3] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63941

Thanks,

                Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to