manojgupta added a comment. > More subjective: for most users this whole -march business is abstracted away > in build systems, so they won't have to deal with this, that's why this isn't > so much of an improvement.
> If we want a better user experience set options, there are probably other > things that are more important, like checking legal/illegal architecture > combinations. > So, in summary, we prefer not to go ahead with this. And the precedent that > was mentioned, -mcrc, should probably be deprecated. I'd argue the contrary that the current way of -march=isa+feature is broken. I am yet to see a build system that understands or processes the values inside march arguments. And this blocks users from choosing custom hw features without resorting to terrible hacks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113779/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113779 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
