================
@@ -60,11 +63,11 @@ int use() {
// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = constant
// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = constant
-// CHECK: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = external unnamed_addr
+// CHECK: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = external
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}unnamed_addr constant
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}constant
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}constant
+// CHECK-INLINE-NOT: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = constant
----------------
dwblaikie wrote:
`NOT` checks should be pretty broad - for instance these `NOT` checks would've
passed with the old code too (since it was linkonce_odr, not constant) -
perhaps these should just be non-NOT checks, affirmatively checking for the
linkage of these globals (which I assume they are emitted, as declarations - if
they aren't emitted at all, then `NOT: @foo` might be enough, without the ` =
constant`?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
