philnik777 wrote:
> > Note that
> > ```c++
> > auto div(_Complex float lhs, _Complex float rhs) {
> > return lhs / rhs;
> > }
> >
> > int main() {
> > return __real div(1.f, 2.f);
> > }
> > ```
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > will fail to link on windows due to `__divsc3` not being available. Similar
> > programs probably also fail due to other compiler-rt functions not being
> > available.
>
> I _think_ Clang still gets to claim conformance here because we handle the
> language side of things correctly and the user is responsible for linking to
> a runtime library with appropriate support for the platform. However, this
> sure does straddle the line in some ways, so I could see this being a reason
> to claim "partial" conformance.
IIRC the problem is that you can't get compiler-rt on windows. If it was just a
matter of compiling compiler-rt with clang I'd be 100% with you. Partial
conformance with a note that some operations require compiler-rt functions that
aren't available on windows seems like a good compromise to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88161
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
