================ @@ -7735,7 +7735,8 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildResolvedCallExpr(Expr *Fn, NamedDecl *NDecl, } if (CXXMethodDecl *Method = dyn_cast_or_null<CXXMethodDecl>(FDecl)) - if (Method->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction()) + if (!isa<RequiresExprBodyDecl>(CurContext) && ---------------- jcsxky wrote:
Do you mean that checking whether `Method` is an implicit object function is redundant? After I removed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/844b532713986999aa1ffed0883eff2d1339ec7a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp#L7723-L7726 These testcase failed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/844b532713986999aa1ffed0883eff2d1339ec7a/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr3xx.cpp#L1084-L1095 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/844b532713986999aa1ffed0883eff2d1339ec7a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-using-decl.cpp#L150-L168 with no diagnose. Or the checking shouldn't be placed at current position? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85198 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
