================
@@ -160,3 +160,22 @@ namespace GH88929 {
using E = P...[0]; // expected-error {{unknown type name 'P'}} \
// expected-error {{expected ';' after alias
declaration}}
}
+
+namespace GH88925 {
+template <typename...> struct S {};
+
+template <int...> struct sequence {};
+
+template <typename... Args, int... indices> auto f(sequence<indices...>) {
+ return S<Args...[indices]...>(); // #use
+}
+
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
> I guess we can perceive dependent PackIndexingExprs as LValues in such cases,
> like what we did for UnresolvedLookupExpr. Additionally, P2662 now limits
> them to id-expressions only, and hence we can probably always treat them as
> LValues?
Yes, they are always LValues for now. So we might want to do that indeed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90195
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
