================
@@ -14638,6 +14649,8 @@ bool FloatExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr
*E) {
return true;
}
+ case Builtin::BIfmin:
+ case Builtin::BIfminf:
----------------
hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
I think we'll be missing at least "pedantic" diagnostics if we don't restrict
the `constexpr`-ness to C++23 and up. So we do need that restriction.
The interaction with `-fno-builtin[-*]` may need more discussion. At least the
documentation for that option would need to be updated if the C++23 `constexpr`
math would break with it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88978
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
