================ ---------------- mizvekov wrote:
> Sounds like should perhaps note that we are implementing our own resolution, > until there's an update to the cwg issue that can be referred to? That could be. Is there another similar issue we could use as a reference on the format for this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
