Sorry, I forgot to Cc the list on this message, so I forward it again: -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: "Thomas Chust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet: 21.07.06 08:22:37 An: Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Betreff: Re: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming
Hello, in my humble opinion the new names are as good or bad as the old ones -- I would have chosen completely different symbols in the first place. But changing the names would break a bunch of my existing code, so I vote for a new egg or for leaving the names as they are if there isn't a more important reason to change them than mere aesthetics. cu, Thomas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet: 20.07.06 17:36:33 An: chicken <chicken-users@nongnu.org> Betreff: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming [...] call/synch => call-with/synch apply/synch => call/synch apply-with/synch => apply/synch apply-with/synch will now use the mutex specific as the 1st argument. Added synch-with which binds a local variable to the mutex specific. So *-with means "with mutex specific". [...] ______________________________________________________________ Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193 _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users