On 2013-06-06 12:19, Felix wrote: > From: Thomas Chust <ch...@web.de> >> [...] >> when I first saw that code I thought that this must be incorrect, too. >> Then I checked the CHICKEN documentation for foreign-safe-lambda and read: >> >> "This is similar to foreign-lambda, but also allows the called >> function to call Scheme functions and allocate Scheme data-objects." >> > > The part about allocation is wrong, I'd say. > [...]
Hello, thank you for the clarification :-) So what about allocating locally and not returning an object but passing it to a Scheme callback from inside a foreign-safe-lambda? Is that ok or can it happen that the callback stores this object away but never copies it into the second generation heap? Ciao, Thomas -- When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
