On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Dan Leslie <d...@ironoxide.ca> wrote:
> > You might want to consider the nanomsg egg, which doesn't appear to have > a wiki page yet. > > https://github.com/Adellica/chicken-nanomsg > Oh, great, yet another alternative to consider! :-/ Well, maybe. I've never heard of nanomsg before. Any idea how widely-used/well-supported it is? PS: I still think the future of the zmq egg should be addressed, even if I end up not using it. It doesn't seem very useful to have a library binding that is two major versions behind. Unless someone is using it in production, I'd say it should either be updated or withdrawn. Matt
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
